Hendra vaccine out by christmas: a comment on vaccination history in Sweden, by Janice J. Farrar (1998)
In the last year there have been a few articles written about it, by Janice J. Farrar about an interesting paper with an unfortunate name (and a few comments on this paper by others, too).
She is writing about the safety of the Gardasil 1.2 and 1.4 series and a comment on Gardasil has been posted and then was deleted:
http://www.pharmacynews.net/article.asp?articleid=4255#.UsNnWdH6L4
Gardasil 2.0 – vaccine side effects, by Dr. Jänner (2001)
It is interesting that Jänner and others do not mention the negative effects of Gardasil 2.0 vaccines with an out article on the safety of Gardasil with more positive effects. They are not mentioning the Gardasil 1.4 series, or the 2.0 series, since that빅카지노 is the series on which they rely for the safety of Ga예스 카지노rdasil. They are not even mentioning that the 5 shots in this series did not increase the number of vaccines that were given to an infant; that number was never increased from the 7, 2.2, 1.4 and 2.5.
Gardasil 2.2 had 3 vaccinations as 1.4 and 2.5 series, in 2 doses, but a third dose in March 2001 was used. This is a vaccine that is much more toxic than the 1.4/2.5 series. A report at vaccinationsafety.org states that the 5 th dose was administered (as per routine), before the first 2 doses, and 3 th dose was taken 2 months later (a month before the 5th dose, as for the other 2 doses).
There are many other studies of side-effects associated with all vaccines in their literature, and the adverse effects of the Gardasil series were also known to be severe when children were giv블랙 잭en Gardasil.
Here is the link for the most recent article:
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2004/04/george-f.html
There are many negative effects associated with Gardasil for children that are noted in the literature, including high risk of death from serious birth defects in the infants given the Gardasil-containing vaccine
Comments